Anorexia Nervosa cannot be satisfactorily accounted for by any single model of abnormality

Anorexia is a condition disputed by psychologists in attempts to bob up a hold for the worry. Anorexia is when an individual chooses to emaciate themselves in articulate to be thin. There ar devil main types of reasoning bed such(prenominal) behaviour. The biological and psychological commentary. Of course, in that location ar umteen forms of branched out explanations inwardly these, and the two of which that I sh altogether be exploring be the genetic justification (in basis of biological) and the behaviouristic approach, for the psychological relation.Biological psychologists believe that valet de chambre behaviour and what makes us do what we do, is all down to genes. With the new advance in recent science, genes are becoming a more popular reasoning to many psychological issues. Anorexia nervosa for one. The genetic approach proclaims that the micturate for anorexia is to do with genes i.e. the genetic and inherited factors we bedevil within our relations. Th e idea is that should one family atom suffer from an eating disorder, whence there is a higher(prenominal) chance that some some other family member (preferably those who carry on the same, or same(p) genes) would contract an eating, or a nonher obsessive-compulsive disorder.Holland et al, a group of psychologists, lead a study on the genetic pertain of anorexia nervosa in 1984. They perused a example of 34 pairs of jibe and one set of triplets, where at least one twin in each pair suffered from anorexia. They found a higher concordance rate of 55% for the 16 monozygotic twins (who share 100% of the same genes) than for the 14 pairs of dizygotic twins, (who share 50% of the same genes) with a concordance rate of but 7%. The results, in imprecise terms, suggested that there was a genetic link surrounded by family members crucifixion from anorexia nervosa.But on c missr examination of the study, we finish find many other reasons, which whitethorn non be genetic, for th ese findings. For example, the sample amount was very small. This is a major(ip) flaw in any experiment, as the sample surface often inescapably to a representative size, which send away be extended to the whole of society, but 35 pairs of twins is an extremely small amount. Furthermore, the environmental influences were not considered in this experiment, and so the higher concordance rates for the monozygotic twins could be because they are treated more a alike(p) than the dizygotic twins. This is part of behavioristic psychology of which I shall study later on.In terms of reasonability, the genetic link between family members suffering from anorexia seems to be weak. Though it buttocks be part of the reason or perhaps only accurate for only a very few, it cannot be whole responsible for allone who suffers from this eating disorder.A problem with this reasoning as being the serve well is that there is then no find fault of self. Because the condition is purely biological, the individual is then rendered dim and vulnerable to the disorder, as they are not in control of what is in their genes. It can also provide an excuse so that the open is unable, or unwilling to become better.Psychologically, behaviourists cypher at how the environment and outside influences contribute shaped and created an individual. Predominantly in westbound cultures, the size of beauty in terms of celebrity and media has dramatically decreased in the last couple of decades. Marilyn Monroe, said to be one of the most beautiful adult female of the time was a dress size 14. As the years gone by, we find that the dress size of beauty has gone down, and now, catwalk models are size 8s and lower. It seems that the more racy and advanced we become, the higher our standards are, for skinnier mickle.The media is a major factor in influencing the ordinary mickle of our society. Behaviourists believe that this is one of the main causes for people (particularly those with lower self-esteem) to develop eating disorders, in order to become more like the person in the magazine.Because of this, people are often seen as beautiful when they are thin. This puts constrict on people who perhaps may open been teased and felt self-aware about their self-image. Once the individual begins to bear load, it is often found that the criticism stops, and pauperization are received in its place. This can then become a habit, and is cognise as Classical instruct. They fill to associate being thin with olfactory modality effectual about themselves. Operant conditioning happens when the praise and admiration from others reinforces their eating habits and causes them to want to lose more free weight.This form of explanation is very logical in authentic aspects, but there are a few things that, should this theory be true, does not cor resolve appropriately. For example, once the martyr begins to lose too much weight and is then the cause for concern, why is it that once the wish stop, the sufferer mum desires to lose weight? The praise were associated to feeling good and losing weight. The compliments are no longer there, and so one would assume the feeling good should have dissolved, and due to operative conditioning, the sufferer would learn to break the habit. It is true that operant does sometimes work on promoting weight gain in some people, by if this concept was accurate, then why doesnt everyone with anorexia respond in the same way?Anorexia Nervosa cannot be satisfactorily accounted for by any wizard model of abnormalityIt is true that anorexia cannot be the result of one cause, as we have looked at two versions of reasoning behind the condition and both explanations still bring gaps where logic or situation does not fit. Each explanation gives a validated justification to anorexia, but the problem still cannot be solved by one account of psychology. The answer may be that it is a mixture of perhaps several(prenominal) models of abnormality, but the fact is that anorexia nervosa is too multifactorial and too different in every case to be the epitome of one explanation.